"Is my mother-in-law an employee?" Ham Ik-byeong engages in verbal dispute with mother-in-law over CF profit distribution

The conversation between doctor Ham Ik-byeong and his mother-in-law regarding the issue of distributing profits from commercial (CF) filming is drawing attention. According to the content revealed through the broadcast, Ham Ik-byeong stated that when filming commercials, he shares a portion of the profits as compensation for hospital staff who assist with tasks such as schedule coordination and on-site support.

"I give it to all the employees, but what about my mother-in-law?" The profit distribution structure revealed by Ham Ik-byeong

Ham Ik-byeong explained the profit structure that occurs at commercial filming sites. When commercial filming proceeds, staff members such as hospital managers or nurses assist with tasks like adjusting schedules and preparing costumes, and he stated that he shares the profits (CFP) generated during this process with the hospital staff. In particular, since some of those helping with on-site work include family members, Ham Ik-byeong mentioned this as having the nature of a 'family allowance.'

In this process, the mother-in-law pointed out that while Ham Ik-byeong shares profits with the employees, he does not provide a separate distribution to her. The mother-in-law expressed the position that she also plays a role when he films commercials, implying that she should also have a share in the same context as the compensation paid to employees. In response, the debate continued as Ham Ik-byeong emphasized that the employees are the ones performing the actual work.

"A boss of an organization taking money from a subordinate organization?" A metaphor for family relationships

In response to the mother-in-law's demand, Ham Ik-byeong reacted by comparing the family relationship to an 'organization.' Regarding the situation where the mother-in-law demands a share of her son's earnings, remarks were exchanged suggesting it was as if a boss of an organization were trying to take money earned by a subordinate organization. The mother-in-law presented the logic that if her son did not exist, she (the daughter) would not exist either, showing an attitude that she has a right to demand as a family member.

During this conversation, reactions emerged among the cast members that the family relationship seems to operate like a single organization. Ham Ik-byeong suggested that while such a demand might be logically sound, there is a unique point regarding the setting of relationships between family members.

"Is the son-in-law a pushover?" A continuing conversation about money and pocket money

The profit distribution dispute expanded into a discussion about the role of a son-in-law. As it was mentioned that Ham Ik-byeong usually provides pocket money or buys items during traditional holidays or family events, a joking conversation ensued about whether the son-in-law is a 'bong' (pushover) given the continuous demands from the mother-in-law. Ham Ik-byeong addressed his relationship with his mother-in-law while mentioning his position of unilaterally giving.

Ham Ik-byeong has shown a meticulous side by regularly sending food items such as tofu or soft tofu to his mother-in-law, and the footage captured the intersection of family bonds and conflict in the process of these actions being delivered to her.

Source: original video (YouTube)